- What happens when a pharmaceutical company decides to stop making lifesaving medication because it’s no longer profitable enough?
- Pharma giant Novo Nordisk cited “capacity limitations” as the reason for their decision not to bid for a new contract, which started in May, to supply the health department with human insulin pens.
- Yet demand for its newer diabetes and weight-loss drugs — which they sell for much more than insulin — has skyrocketed over the past few years.
- The health department’s head of procurement, Khadija Jamaloodien, says it’s “not that obvious, but we can infer from their actions that they’re prioritising other more profitable products”.
In today’s newsletter, Christina Pitt explains pharma greed is cutting South Africa off from diabetes medication. Sign up now.
What happens when a pharmaceutical company decides to stop making lifesaving medication because it’s no longer profitable enough?
Since May this year, the health department has had to ration how many injection pens filled with human insulin, for the treatment of diabetes, it can give each clinic or hospital.
An injection pen consists of a pre-filled tube of insulin set in a plastic casing. A dial for measuring out a dose is at the back of the casing and a single-use needle is fitted at the front end. The pens are easy to use because it makes a “click” sound as the dial is turned past marked numbers on the tube to measure out the right dose.
The health department’s predicament is because the pharmaceutical company Novo Nordisk, who’s been supplying stock for the past three years didn’t put in a bid for the new three-year contract for this treatment, which was to start in May.
When Bhekisisa asked about the company’s reason for this, vice president and general manager for the South African operation, Sara Norcross, cited “capacity limitations”. They let the health department know in October last year that they won’t be putting in a new tender for pens, she says, but that they will still supply human insulin — in vials.
Between 2020 and 2022, the number of prescriptions for drugs called glucagon-like peptides, which are used for blood sugar control and also double up as weight-loss medicines, increased 300% in the United States (US) alone. In America, Novo Nordisk’s three brands of these medications come with a hefty price tag. One of their injectable brands, Ozempic, costs about R17 000 ($936) per month; the other, Wegovy, sells for around R24 700 ($1 349) a month. The company also makes the medicine as a pill, called Rybelsus, for which a month’s supply goes for R17 000 ($936). Together these three brands accounted for two-thirds of the company’s roughly R390-billion ($21.1-billion) revenue in 2023.
Ironically, were it not for diabetes, these medicines would never have been developed.
“The [human insulin] shortage shows the direction pharmaceutical companies are going in — [it’s] where the money is. This time around people have options, but what happens next time around when there’s none?” asks Candice Sehoma, advocacy adviser of Doctors without Borders (MSF).
Plan B
When someone’s pancreas doesn’t make any (or enough) insulin (a hormone), they have too much sugar in their blood. This leads to a condition called diabetes and many of these patients need to inject a lab-made form of the hormone to help lower their blood sugar to a healthy level. (Because the medication mimics how the body’s natural sugar-control hormone works, it’s called human insulin.)
The “options” Sehoma refers to stems from the situation not being a complete stockout. Injectable insulin treatment will remain available in the public sector, says Khadija Jamaloodien, the health department’s head of procurement, but the alternatives — medication that comes in a small glass bottle and which the user has to draw up manually in a syringe or pens that deliver a different type of insulin — are more cumbersome to use or more expensive, and therefore fewer people who rely on state healthcare will be able to get convenient treatment.
Novo Nordisk was the only company contracted to supply South Africa with human insulin, whether in injection pens or in vials.
The health department says to manage the situation, they have sourced a small supply of human insulin pens and ones with a different formulation of insulin, for the elderly, young children and people with vision problems.
Other patients, though, will have to switch to drawing up insulin from a vial or learn to use a different type, which will mean they have to check their blood sugar levels daily and possibly also change how much insulin they have to inject.
Jamaloodien says the reason for the supplier not choosing to tender for a new contract was not directly communicated to the health department. “It’s not that obvious, but we can infer from their actions that they’re prioritising other more profitable products”.
Money, money, money
Novo Nordisk sells a pen of human insulin to the government for about R30 each. That means that from the close to 13.7-million pens the state bought between 2021 and 2024, the pharma company earned almost R415-million.
To buy pens filled with the alternative type of insulin, from the pharmaceutical supplier Sanofi, it costs the health department between about R51 and R73 a shot. For the roughly 270 000 units the state ordered, the manufacturer therefore got about R19-million.
Three companies — Novo Nordisk, Eli Lilly and Sanofi — control 95% of the insulin market in poorer countries. Although there are also other insulin manufacturers in the world, due to the patents held by the Big Three, the smaller companies need a licence from them to make the products.
This means the three companies “can set prices as high as they want”, says MSF, which has led to a lawsuit in the US against the drugmakers and three businesses that negotiate what patients pay for their medicine, for alleged excessive pricing and unfair business practices.
The might of a pen
With injection pens filled with human insulin soon to disappear from public clinics or hospitals in South Africa, many patients will have no option but to switch to filling their syringes from a vial even though eight out of ten people across 38 countries, which included many from poorer regions, prefer pens, an MSF report shows.
People will still get their insulin, says Jamaloodien, but the delivery method will be different and more inconvenient.
Shiara Pillay, a 29-year-old project manager from Cape Town who’s been using insulin pens for about ten years, says these devices are easier to use than having to fiddle with filling a syringe manually from a glass container. She recalls that she “definitely broke a few vials and [had] bent needles [as a school child] because [they] are difficult to travel with”.
Pens are also more discreet because you can inject yourself anywhere without people noticing, but people tend to stare when you use a syringe in public, she says.
Because syringes take longer to prepare for injection (for example, you have to get the vial ready, use the syringe correctly and ensure that there aren’t any air bubbles in the liquid) and the user having to judge from the markings on the barrel what the exact amount is that they’re drawing up, using insulin from a vial can be difficult, says head of endocrinology at Groote Schuur Hospital, Joel Dave.
For some people — like those with poor eyesight or the elderly, whose hands might not be so steady anymore — it could also be dangerous.
The body needs a stable amount of sugar in the blood at all times to ensure that its cells always have enough energy. If your blood sugar level is too high, you need insulin to lower the amount of glucose in the blood. But, if your blood sugar level drops too low — for example, if someone injected too much insulin — it can lead to a coma or even death.
Injecting too little insulin has the opposite effect: blood sugar levels remain high, which in the long run can cause serious harm to your kidneys (and so your body can’t get rid of waste) or damage your nerves.
Although the health department did receive bids for injection pens that contain a different formulation of the sugar-control hormone, called insulin analogues, Jamaloodien says because they’re more expensive than the human insulin pens, it’s difficult to supply all diabetes patients with these options.
Moreover, the make-up of insulin analogues is different from that of human insulin (to make it work faster or stay in your body longer) and so when or how someone has to take their shot is different. So even if a patient is familiar with using an injection pen, they will still have to learn to use the new type of medicine correctly, explains Dave.
“When you use human insulin, you should take it about 30 minutes before you eat, whereas insulin analogues [newer formulations that work faster] can be injected, preferably, 5–10 minutes before a meal or within 20 minutes after eating. If you take it [a rapid-acting analogue] too early, your blood sugar could drop low because it works quickly.”
A sign of the times
For diabetes patients who have to switch to vials and syringes for their insulin fix, the move puts them at least 10 years back from when human insulin pens were first introduced in South Africa to deal with their illness.
The situation is a repeating pattern of global health inequalities that leave poorer countries with the short end of the stick, says Sehoma.
People in European countries have more access to insulin pens, with up to nine out of 10 having started using insulin pens by 2008. But in poorer regions, a 2019 survey of diabetes care facilities in which 37 countries took part, showed that roughly eight out of ten children and young people used vials and syringes even though almost three-quarters of them preferred pens.
Such disparities in access to healthcare between rich and poor countries have existed for many years, even during global crises.
Madhukar Pai, an expert in epidemiology and global health from McGill University, criticised wealthy nations that “hoarded vaccines and trashed millions of expired vaccines” during the COVID pandemic while Africa was left last in line as the least vaccinated continent in the world in 2021. It is estimated that more than a million lives were lost in that year because of this stockpiling.
Similarly, during the Ebola outbreak in West Africa between 2014 and 2016, more than 11 000 people died, but, wrote Pai, “investments in research and development dramatically increased only after white people fell sick with Ebola” — more than 900-fold, a study shows.
Says Sehoma: “Pharmaceutical companies will always prioritise money and invest in products where they are more likely to get profit. In doing so, they put money over people’s health.”
Christina Pitt is a health journalist at Bhekisisa.